Quantitative Determination of Total Hardness In Drinking Water Essay

AbstractThis audition is intimately the determination of wet gracelessness with the use of complexometric EDTA titration. Determination of peeing ruggedness is authorised to find out the or so suitable piss sternness nether peculiar(prenominal) circumstances. This was conducted for the affair of applying the concept of complexometric titration utilise an in effect(p) chelating agent, EDTA. Sample mineral pee was analyse victimisation warning EDTA with EBT as index finger, and atomic number 20 ions present in the declaration were calculated to determine the hardness of the body of peeing type. At the end of the investigate, the results indicated that the mineral example water has large amounts of atomic number 20 and magnesium ionsan implication of a hard water sample.INTRODUCTION urine hardness is a measure of the amount of calcium and magnesium present in sample water. These calcium and magnesium ions induct the ability to replace sodium or potassi um ions and exploit sparingly soluble products or precipitates. body of water hardness is baffling in variant aspects of industrial and biochemical processes. Large amounts of ppm CaCO3 in water house discrepancy precipitates when interacted with ooze and form rings known as scum in several utensils and appliances. The institution of these scum in electrical appliances degrades its aptitude and will even sotually reduce its liveliness span. In addition, these can cook impairments on fabric as well, and damage water treatment plants and piping systems at a water hardness of 300 ppm CaCO3.calcium is necessary for aquatic animals such as fish. It serves animportant role in fig up formation, blood clotting, and metabolic processes of the fish and prevents the handout of important salts in the body which helps in the functioning of its vital organs such as the heart. Small amounts of calcium in water can be monstrous to aquatic organisms like the fish. Thus, determinatio n of water hardness is important. superstar regularity of ascertain water hardness is through complexometric titration. In this process, a ligand is involved in the say titration.Metal ion reacts with a particular ligand forming a complex and the equivalence point is fit(p) by an indicator. Theligand used in the taste is Ethylenediaminetetraacetic Acid (EDTA) with Eriochrome dispirited T indicator. EDTA is an efficient chelating agent and has an ability to bind with admixture ions. Because of this, EDTA is also used in solid food preservation, an anti-coagulant in blood, and, when EDTA is combined with Fe(II), can even be used as an powerful absorbent of harmful NO (nitric oxide). The purpose of this investigate is to determine the hardness of water through complexometric titration.METHODOLOGYBefore the genuine experiment, events of 500 mL of 0.1000 M spud EDTA origin, 250 mL of 0.0100 M prototype EDTA origin, 250 mL of 0.050 M model CaCO3 beginning, 50 mL of 0.005 0 M running(a) tired CaCO3 dissolver, and 250 mL of 1.0 M NH3-NH4+ modify store solution were alert quantitatively. In this experiment, the titrant used was Ethylenediaminetetraacetic Acid (EDTA), a polydentate with six bonding sites. Polydentates aid in obtaining sharper final results since they react more in all with cations. Likewise, reply with polydentates only involves a one step process comp atomic number 18d to apply monodentates as titrants which involves at least two mean(a) species. Among polydentates, EDTA was chosen as the titrant since it is versatile and forms virtually sufficiently stable chelates because of its several complexing sites which gives trick out to a cage-like structure isolating the cations from dissolving agent molecules.For the homework of 500 mL of 0.1000 M line of descent EDTA solution, 18.6 g of Na2H2EDTA2H2O was weighed to the nearest 0.1 mg and was transferred into a 400 mL beaker. cc mL of distilled waterand 1.0 g MgCl26H2O cryst als were added into the beaker and confused until the crystals were dissolved. MgCl26H2O was added to obtain a sharper endpoint since CaIn- complex ion is less stable and endpoint will come earlier than actual. The solution was heated for faster dissolution and NaOH pellets were added to the murky solution to produce salt EDTA make the pH of the solution higher and castrate magnitude the solubility of the EDTA. Into a 500 mL volumetric flaskful, the solution was transferred and was cut to brand name with distilled water. The solution was stored in a modify and clean reagent nursing bottle. The 250 mL of 0.0100 M standard EDTA solution was prepared by getting 25 mL from 0.1000 M stock EDTA solution and diluting it to mark with distilled water in a 250 mL volumetric flask. For the preparation of 250 mL of 0.050 M standard CaCO3 solution, 1.2510 g of pure CaCO3 was weighed to the nearest 0.1mg into a 250 mL beaker and 20 mL distilled water was added.Drops of 6 M HCl were ad ded until the CaCO3 was completely dissolved. The beaker was c everywhereed using a watch glass and was institutionalise over a hot plate. The solution was evaporated until an amount of 10 mL was left. after(prenominal) cooling the solution, the washings were collected by rinsing the watch glass into the beaker using distilled water. 20 mL more distilled water was added into the solution and it was transferred into a 250-mL volumetric flask. The solution was reduce to mark and was stored in a tensile polyethylene bottle since glass bottle can leach and ions from it will grime the solution. The 50 mL of 0.0050 M working standard CaCO3 solution was prepared by dilution of 5 mL 0.050 M standard CaCO3 into a 50-mL volumetric flask. For NH3-NH4+ buffer solution of pH 10, 2.06 g of NH4Cl was dissolved in 14.3 mL of concentrated ammonia and was diluted to mark in a 250-mL volumetric flask. Buffer solution was used since buffers are stand upant to pH changes13.Maintaining the pH is im portant in preventing interference of other species during titration since varied chelates form at a particular pH.14 For the standardization of 0.01 M EDTA Solution, 10 mL each of 0.0050 M working standard CaCO3 solution was transferred into each of the three 250-mL Erlenmeyer flask using a pipette. Then, into each flask, 75 mL of distilled water was added followed by 3 mL of the NH3-NH4+ buffer solution and 2-3 drops of Eriochrome Black T (EBT) indicator. Although use of EBT indicator is unequal in calcium, it is ideal to use in magnesium titration15, and since MgCl2 was put earlier, the number of calcium ions can be determineusing EBT indicator16. One at a time, the solutions were titrated with the 0.010 M standard EDTA solution. Water sample was analyzed by measuring 50 mL of commercial mineral water viva into each of the three 250-mL Erlenmeyer flask. Then, into each flask, 75 mL of distilled water was added followed by 3 mL of the NH3-NH4+ buffer solution and 2-3 drops of E BT indicator. One at a time, the solutions were titrated with the 0.010 M standard EDTA solution. RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONComplexometric titration was used in the experiment since the reaction between the aqueous solutions of the analyte (CaCO3 solution, water sample) and titrant (EDTA) forms a complex. Which involves a coordination center undisturbed of Ca2+ and Mg2+ and the chelating agent EDTA. EDTA, a weak acidulous, ordinarily forms 11 stochiometric ratio when it reacts to form soluble complexes with metal ions, this means that a single endpoint would be observed. most(prenominal) of the time EDTA reacts with metals regardless of their charges. These would all agree to a sharp endpoint in titration and a smooth calculation in stoichiometry. Titration with EDTA is minted by several factors such as the existence of complex forming ions and of radical solvents that affects the stability of the complex, the metal ion components, and the pH wherein the titration was per organis e. The pH range for optimal indications using EBT indicator and for better results in titration using EDTA method is from 8-10.Lower pH would form a colorless complex with EDTA while a high pH makes it hard to steal using the metal indicator In the experiment the pH was kept immutable at 10, this was possible with the presence of the buffer solution of NH3 NH4Cl. It has a buffer capacity that satisfies the optimal pH range. Buffer solutions resist pH change that might be caused by other cations and the weak acid titrant, EDTA. Also, the indicator EBT would behave as it should be if there are no fluctuations in the pH. The specific pH was essential because at the pH of 10 EDTA would deprotonate just large to bind with the metals involved. If withal much buffer was added to the solution, the titration would yield defective endpoints. For example the pH was at 12, the solution would be too basic that it might form precipitates with magnesium and calcium which in turn would cause di fferent results. The endpoint of the solution in the first trial was blue so we opt non to put KCN in the solution. KCN bonds with atomic number 26so that iron would not affect the color change of the indicator. If iron is present in the sample it would affect the color endpoint and turn to regal instead of blue. Chemical equations that express the reaction in the titration can be shown in figure 1.Figure 1. Chemical equations involved in the titration.In the sample summary of viva voce mineral water, it contained 54mgCa/L and 14mgMg/L. aft(prenominal) computing for the make out hardness of the sample using ppm CaCO3 it was ground out that the claimed sum total hardness was 192.6 ppm CaCO3 while the computed average ppm CaCO3 from the experiment was 139.5 ppm CaCO3this means that the calculated appreciate from the experiment is less than the calculated total hardness of viva voce mineral water jibe to the indicated value in the label plainly still in the range of hard a ccording to the water hardness weighing machine in table 1. Table 1 Water Hardness ScaleThe social unit ppm CaCO3 was used because water is mostly comprise of calcium and magnesium ions. Both of these ions can be expressed in foothold of CaCO3 One possible source of phantasm is the human break from differentiating color change of the indicator EBT. The solution might have turned violet nevertheless not observed making the titrant endpoint victimize because of the presence of iron. Other possible sources of flaw are excess buffer solution that will increase pH, calibration error of pH meter, wrong volume reading, and over titration.SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONThe Complex solutions were formed by titration with the chelating agent EDTA. With the use of complexometric titration the total hardness of water sample was determined. It was found out that the water hardness of Viva mineral water is classified as hard in terms of calcium and magnesium ions satiate that was expressed in te rms of ppm CaCO3. The claimed total hardness of Viva Company is larger than the experimental value meaning it has less metal ion content than expected. The results of the experiment can be better with the addition of KCN. It might not be visible that the endpoint was violetbut it would be safer to eliminate iron discrepancies in the results.REFERENCES1 Carillo, K.J.D., Ballesteros, J.I., et al. uninflected chemical science Laboratory Manual, 2009 edition, UP Chemistry Alumni Foundation, 2009, p. 672 Skoog, D.A., West, D.M., et al., doorway to uninflected Chemistry, eighth edition, Cengage accomplishment Asia Pte Ltd., 2012, p. 4033Hardwater,http//water.me.vccs.edu/concepts/hardwater.html4 Wurts, W.A., Understanding Water Hardness, http//www.ca.uky.edu/wkrec/Hardness.htm5 Skoog, D.A., West, D.M., et al., cosmos to Analytical Chemistry, eighth edition, Cengage culture Asia Pte Ltd., 2012, p. 3726 Skoog, D.A., West, D.M., et al., Introduction to Analytical Chemistry, eighth edit ion, Cengage Learning Asia Pte Ltd., 2012, p. 3867 Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid disodium salt dehydrate,http//www.sigmaaldrich.com/etc/medialib/docs/Sigma/Product_Information_Sheet/e5134pis.Par.0001.File.tmp/e5134pis.pdf8 Liu, N. et. al., Evaluation of azotic Oxide Removal from Simulated Flue gas pedal by Fe(II)EDTA/Fe(II)citrate Mixed Absorbents, http//pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/ef300538x?prevSearch=Uses%2Bof%2BEDTA&searchHistoryKey=9 Skoog, D.A., West, D.M., et al., Introduction to Analytical Chemistry, 8th edition, Cengage Learning Asia Pte Ltd., 2012, p. 37210 Skoog, D.A., West, D.M., et al., Introduction to Analytical Chemistry, 8th edition, Cengage Learning Asia Pte Ltd., 2012, p. 38411 Carillo, K.J.D., Ballesteros, J.I., et al. Analytical Chemistry Laboratory Manual, 2009 edition, UP Chemistry Alumni Foundation, 2009, p. 6912 Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid disodium salt dehydrate,http//www.sigmaaldrich.com/etc/medialib/docs/Sigma/Product_Information_Sheet/e5134pis.Par. 0001.File.tmp/e5134pis.pdf13 Whitten, K.et. Al., Chemistry.8th ed., doubting Thomas Higher Education. USA. 2007, p. 74214 Skoog, D.A., West, D.M., et al., Introduction to Analytical Chemistry, 8th edition, Cengage Learning Asia Pte Ltd., 2012, p. 40115 Skoog, D.A., West, D.M., et al., Introduction to Analytical Chemistry, 8th edition, Cengage Learning Asia Pte Ltd., 2012, p. 39916 Skoog, D.A., West, D.M., et al., Introduction to Analytical Chemistry, 8th edition, Cengage Learning Asia Pte Ltd., 2012, p. 400